Showing posts with label Gardasil. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Gardasil. Show all posts

Sunday, 9 March 2014

Sarah's Gardasil Vaccine Injury

Lifting the Veil with Sara Sotomayor




Sarah's blog:

https://sarashealingjourney.wordpress.com/?blogsub=confirming#subscribe-blog

Monday, 12 September 2011

Genetically modified HPV DNA found in Gardasil

Gardasil Vaccine Found to be Contaminated 

(Previous version of this notice stated that Merck had claimed no viral DNA in the Gardasil vaccine for "the last year." It has been corrected to read, "the last five years.")

Dear Canary Party members,

Please take a moment to read this press release from our friends at S.A.N.E. Vax. They tested 13 vials of the Gardasil vaccine, from six different countries, and found that all were contaminated with genetically modified HPV DNA. The vaccine maker Merck, has claimed for the last five years on the package insert that the vaccine contains NO viral DNA. That claim quietly disappeared from the insert this past April, with out any explanation, warning or notice being offered to the pubic.

This is especially important information to get into the public view, as California has just passed a law allowing children as young as 12 to be given the vaccine with out parents even knowing about it.

As you read, keep in mind that the National Institutes of Health holds a patent on the technology that makes the HPV vaccine possible, profiting off of every HPV vaccine sold, and what that might mean with respect to the Department of Health and Human Services taking appropriate action on all the emerging and glaring problems with the these vaccines.

Please read and pass on to your lists and contacts.

Gardasil victim found to have HPV DNA in her blood 2 Years Post-Vaccination
13 different vaccine vials – 13 different lots of Gardasil from around the world tested
Results – 100% contamination with HPV Recombinant DNA.

SANE Vax Inc. contracted with an independent lab to test for contamination and found HPV recombinant DNA (rDNA) in 13 vaccine vials. The Gardasil vials with different lot numbers were from New Zealand, Australia, Spain, Poland, France and three states in the U.S. 100% of the samples tested positive for the presence of the genetically modified HPV DNA.

Dr. Sin Hang Lee, a pathologist at the Milford Hospital pathology laboratory well-known for using cutting-edge DNA sequencing for molecular diagnoses, was initially contracted to examine a single sample of Gardasil for possible contamination. This sample tested positive for recombinant HPV-11 and HPV-18 residues, both of which were firmly attached to the aluminum adjuvant.

In a certified letter mailed to FDA Commissioner, Dr. Margaret Hamburg on August 29, 2011, SANE Vax Inc. requested ‘the FDA investigate the extent of the HPV DNA contamination in the Gardasil HPV4 vaccine currently on the market and take appropriate actions to ensure public safety regarding future shipments.’ 1.

Why Did SANE Vax Inc. Investigate Possible Gardasil Contamination? 

The mother of a sexually naïve adolescent girl who developed acute onset Juvenile Rheumatoid Arthritis within 24 hours of her last injection of the Gardasil™ series contacted SANE Vax Inc. looking for more information.

In an effort to help her now very sick daughter the mother went to an MD practicing naturopath who conducted a toxicity test that eventually found HPV DNA in the girl’s blood. The significance of this finding is that it is highly unusual to find HPV DNA in the blood. HPV, if present in the body, exists in the epithelial (skin and mucosa) membranes. HPV or its DNA, by itself does not survive for any great length of time in the bloodstream. Why was the HPV DNA in her bloodstream two years post-vaccination?

Natural vs. Recombinant DNA

According to Dr. Lee, “‘Natural HPV DNA does not remain in the bloodstream for very long. However, the HPV DNA in Gardasil™ is not ‘natural’ DNA. It is a recombinant HPV DNA (rDNA) – genetically engineered – to be inserted into yeast cells for VLP (virus-like-particle) protein production. rDNA is known to behave differently from natural DNA. It may enter a human cell, especially in an inflammatory lesion caused by the effects of the aluminum adjuvant, via poorly understood mechanisms.

“Once a segment of recombinant DNA is inserted into a human cell, the consequences are hard to predict. It may be in the cell temporarily or stay there forever, with or without causing a mutation. Now the host cell contains human DNA as well as genetically engineered viral DNA.”

What is a Recombinant DNA Virus?

Recombinant DNA (rDNA) refers to novel DNA molecules engineered by joining natural or synthetic DNA segments to other DNA molecules so that they can replicate in a living cell. The possibility for these replicable forms of DNA as uncertain toxic substance or as environmental hazard has been a concern since rDNA technology was invented in 1973. Thus, rDNA is considered a potential biohazard, and NIH has mandated that research institutions monitor and regulate its use.2.

All recombinant or genetically engineered DNAs are considered potential biohazards if injected intramuscularly into the body. Merck’s Gardasil™ HPV4 vaccine is administered intramuscularly – as are many other vaccines. However, Gardasil™ is the first vaccine found to be contaminated by a genetically engineered DNA used to manufacture virus-like particle proteins for the vaccine.

SANE Vax Inc. believes the FDA should have required Merck to test for, evaluate and quantify the risks of residual recombinant HPV DNA in Gardasil™ before granting approval for marketing the vaccine. SANE Vax Inc. believes the FDA should require every lot of Gardasil™ be tested for residual HPV DNA prior to shipment.

Gardasil Patient Product Insert Stated No Viral DNA’s in the Vaccine.

In fact, Merck’s Gardasil™ Patient Product Inserts stated that there is ‘no viral DNA’ in the Gardasil vaccine. That is until April 2011 – when the line was glaringly absent from U.S. product inserts. 3.

The European Medicines Agency on line literature still states: ‘Gardasil is an adjuvanted non-infectious recombinant quadrivalent vaccine prepared from the highly purified virus-like particles (VLP’s) of the major capsid L1 protein of HPV types 6, 11, 16 and 18. The VLP’s contain no viral DNA; they cannot infect cells, reproduce or cause the disease.’ 4.

SANE Vax Inc.’s research found that 100% of the 13 samples tested were contaminated with viral HPV DNA residue, including a synthetic construct for HPV11 major capsid protein L1 gene, a recombinant DNA genetically engineered specifically for manufacturing of the Gardasil vaccine. All DNA residue discovered was firmly attached to the insoluble aluminum adjuvant in the vaccine, requiring a new protocol for detection.5

Dr. Lee firmly stated: “Based on medical literature and some of the FDA/Merck’s own publications, adventitious (coming from an outside source) DNA in an injectable protein-based vaccine may increase the risk of autoimmune disorders and gene mutation which may lead to malignancies.”

Merck, the FDA, CDC and the NCI Owe Medical Consumers Answers

SANE Vax Inc. wants to know how many adolescents who have suffered adverse reactions post Gardasil vaccination have HPV DNA in their blood. What are the medical ramifications should HPV DNA remain in the bloodstream for an extended period of time?

Does the aluminum adjuvant become the carrier for HPV DNA causing said DNA to remain in the blood and/or organs for an extended length of time?

Since viral DNA cannot replicate by itself (it needs a host cell) what happens if genetically engineered viral DNA enters a human host cell?

How will this now ‘genetically-engineered cell’ replicate? Will it mutate the host cell leading towards cancer?

How will genetically engineered cells affect the reproductive health of future generations?

How does the immune system react to the detection of a combination viral DNA and human DNA in what was once a ‘normal’ cell? Will the immune system fight the now genetically engineered human cell?

Medical consumers need to have these questions answered by Merck, the FDA, CDC, and NCI.

SANE Vax Inc.’s Position

SANE Vax Inc. believes the FDA and Merck should be transparent and tell medical consumers the potential health impacts the contaminant HPV DNA has brought upon the vaccinated children of the world. High rates of autoimmune disorders, 380 reports of abnormal pap tests, 137 reports of cervical dysplasia, and 41 reports of cervical cancer including Carcinoma in situ or Cervix carcinoma or Cervix carcinoma stage 0 or Cervix carcinoma stage I or Cervix carcinoma stage III 6 warrants an immediate investigation into Gardasil’s™ safety and efficacy.

SANE Vax Inc. believes the FDA and Merck should have tested, evaluated and quantified the risk of the residual recombinant HPV DNA in Gardasil™ before vaccine approval.

SANE Vax Inc. believes that both the FDA and Merck were at least negligent and perhaps fraudulent when claiming there was ‘no HPV (viral) DNA’ in the Gardasil™ vaccine.

Sources:






The direct link to SANE Vax's press release is here. http://sanevax.org/sane-vax-inc-discovers-potential-bio-hazard-contaminant-in-merck%E2%80%99s-gardasil%E2%84%A2-hpv-4-vaccine/ Please spread the word to your contacts and local media outlets.

Ginger Taylor, M.S.
Executive Director
Follow The Canary Party:

Sunday, 21 August 2011

Gardasil® Developer Claims Vaccine Prevents Abnormal Pap Tests, Not Cervical Cancer

By Truth About Gardasil.org

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America (Free-Press-Release.com) February 14, 2011 -- “A pap smear never harmed anyone,"says Dr. Diane Harper, lead developer of Gardasil®, the HPV vaccine manufactured by Merck Pharmaceuticals. In this segment we delve deeper into that and other statements made by Dr. Harper. She also was involved heavily in the development of Cervarix®, the HPV Vaccine manufactured by GlaxoSmithKline. In this segment some interesting comments pertain to both HPV vaccines.

In our first segment, Harper made some startling clarifications about the use of Gardasil® in boys and men, and how, "Unfortunately, the FDA has given Merck a blanket approval to use Gardasil® in males 9-26." She further admitted neither Gardasil® nor Cervarix® would cure or treat a current diagnosis of HPV, but that some have hypothesized that these vaccinated people instead may "react poorly" to these vaccines.

When asked to clarify her statement about pap smears, she stated, “The best way to prevent cervical cancer is with routine Pap screening starting at age 21 years. Vaccination cannot prevent as many cervical cancers as can Pap screening. Pap screening with vaccination does NOT lower your chances of cervical cancer - Pap screening and vaccination lowers your chances of an abnormal Pap test. Gardasil® is associated with GBS [Guillian-Barre Syndrome] that has resulted in deaths. Pap screening using a speculum and taking cells from the cervix is not a procedure that results in death.” She further tells us,"Gardasil® can be offered along with Cervarix® as an option to prevent abnormal Pap test results in those women who can make an informed decision about how much they value this benefit compared to the rare risk of GBS. If a woman has no access to Pap screening, receiving HPV vaccines may help reduce cervical cancer IF the vaccines last long enough. At this time, Gardasil® is proven to last for at least 5 years, and Cervarix® for at least 8.5 years. Health policy analyses show that there will be no reduction in cervical cancer unless the vaccine lasts at least 15 years."

In our time with Dr. Harper, we learned that she feels that those who participate in male with male sex may have some protection against anal cancer. However, she also states that in order for Gardasil® or Cervarix ® to truly make a difference, they must be effective for at least 15 years. At this time, neither HPV vaccine fits this description. She also admits there is the connection of serious side effects and deaths with these vaccines. In fact, we asked Harper if she had a statement she would like to make to those who have suffered side effects. She replied, “Please push for full disclosure in consent forms so that parents and potential vaccinated persons can weigh the benefits and risks of the HPV vaccination from their own perspective. Having federal funding to researchers to aid in setting up full disclosure consent forms will help the process of decision making." 

We then asked about the possible side effects that can be caused by Gardasil®, and her response was,“The side effects are many; most require only time to reverse. For the severe autoimmune demyelinating diseases, working with a neurologist is often helpful.” However, when we asked her how much time she thought it would take for these side effects to wear off, as some of those affected are approaching three and four years of being injured, Harper stated, “I do not know of a time frame in which the side effects will wear off.” 

This interview has raised some serious questions. If the HPV vaccines need to be last a minimum of fifteen years in order to be effective and lower the incidence of cervical cancer in women, why are they being so heavily marketed when the developer states Gardasil® lasts five years and Cervarix® lasts just over eight?

In our next segment, Dr.Harper will go into detail about the use of placebos in the HPV vaccines, and if there was one used in the HPV vaccine trials. 

Wednesday, 22 June 2011

“Gardasil, One Less Victim of Cervical Cancer?” France says ‘NO’ as they ban Gardasil ads


France says the award winning advertising campaign for Gardasil is false and misleading. The Sanevax Team wants to know - Where was the press coverage when this happened? Why did no one break the news to the public?

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

PRLog (Press Release) – Jan 04, 2011 – Amidst all of the media hype surrounding HPV vaccines, the traditional press has remained silent on many critical issues, not the least of which occurred on the 31 of August 2010 in France. As of that date, Merck’s marketing partner for the HPV vaccine Gardasil, Sanofli-Pasteur, was officially prohibited from advertising Gardasil for cervical cancer prevention in France. 

According to public documentation, the Director General of the French Agency for Safety of Health Products (AFSSAPS) found the sponsor of several Gardasil ads to be in direct violation of the French public health code. 

These violations included, but were not limited to: 

* Claiming longer efficacy than was actually proven: The ads stated an 8.5 year efficacy period when, in fact, “the only data of validated efficacy of GARDASIL in the WMA is limited to a maximum assessment of the effectiveness of 4.5 years…..” 

* Making false claims: The ads in question replaced the officially approved use of Gardasil for the “prevention of low-grade lesions (cervical dysplasia and vulvar)” with statements indicating Gardasil be used for “the prevention of premalignant genital lesions (cervical uterus, vulva and vagina), cancers of the cervix and external genital warts…..” 

*More false claims: According to the French Committee on Immunization Practices (CTV) and the High Council of Public Health (HCSP), “the vaccine’s impact on the incidence and mortality of cervical cancer will only become apparent in the long term, in fifteen to twenty-five years….” 

With these and other violations in mind, the Director of AFSSAPS stepped up to the plate and prohibited Sanofli-Pasteur from advertising Gardasil as a vaccine to prevent cervical cancer in France. 

The SaneVax Team would like to formally thank the French government for examining the situation and taking appropriate action. We sincerely hope governments around the world follow your example and prohibit pharmaceutical companies from continuing to mislead medical professionals and consumers by distorting data and making claims of facts where none exist. 

The SaneVax Team would also like to know why this story was not covered by any of our traditional press counterparts. Where are all of the investigative journalists in the world? One has to wonder. 

(Note: Traditional media has ignored this story to such an extent; it took the SaneVax Team some time to confirm the rumor. We had to resort to contacting colleagues working with the Association for those Affected by HPV Vaccines, in Spain to track down official records of the incident. On behalf of medical consumers the world over, SANE Vax, Inc. thanks them for their assistance.) 

Sources: 

For more info, visit http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichTexte.do;jsessionid= ... to see the French documentation 

For more info on AAVP, visit http://www.aavp.es/

# # #

SaneVax believes only Safe, Affordable, Necessary & Effective vaccines and vaccination practices should be offered to the public. Our primary goal is to provide scientific information/resources for those concerned about vaccine safety, efficacy and need.
--- end ---   Visit Press Room

Thursday, 21 April 2011

Parents of daughters & women injured from Gardasil react to FDA decision


Why are medical consumers the medical experiments? Safety and efficacy studies should be conducted for all age groups intended before market release.


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

PRLog (Press Release) – Apr 19, 2011 – On April 7, 2011 the media broke the news about the U.S. FDA’s ruling against Merck's supplemental biologics license application (sBLA) for an indication to use GARDASIL [Human Papillomavirus Quadrivalent (Types 6, 11, 16 and 18) Vaccine, Recombinant] in women ages 27-45. This was Merck’s 4th request to expand Gardasil use to an older population of women. 


According to a report in MedPage Today, (visit http://www.medpagetoday.com/OBGYN/STDs/25776 for details) 


“The decision was based on a trial in 3,253 women ages 27 to 45. Although the vaccine appeared to prevent persistent HPV infection, no significant benefit was found for more important outcomes such as high-grade neoplastic lesions or cervical cancer when all participants were included irrespective of baseline HPV status.” 

Within days the news of the FDA’s decision traveled across the country and across the world.  SANE Vax Inc. asked parents whose daughters have been injured by the vaccine – as well as victims themselves to comment on the decision.   

Instead of protecting her life, it took her life. 


I am thankful that the FDA did not give Merck a license to provide Gardasil for women over the age of 26 to 45 years.  That is only one small step when in my opinion the FDA has made many errors with this program of vaccination.  My 14 year old daughter died after having her second shot of Gardasil.  She was in perfect health until she received this vaccination.  We were told that we had to be responsible parents and that it was important that she have this vaccine.  Instead of protecting her life, it took her life.  The FDA still dares to suggest that this program is safe and effective and the benefits outweigh the risks.  That is not true in my case or in the cases of all those who have lost their daughters, and even their sons, to this vaccine; and not forgetting the many thousands who have also been injured. There can never be a benefit when there is the death of a child. 

Linda Morin, Quebec, Canada 

I am very disappointed in the FDA and CDC in general regarding Gardasil and the monitoring of adverse reactions.  The FDA recently rejected Merck’s 4th request to expand Gardasil use to women 26 years and older.  I think this was a very good decision on their part, but the fact that they have left the vaccine on the market for females 25 and below is appalling.    My 12 year old daughter was disabled by the Gardasil vaccine and missed almost an entire year of school.  2 ½ years later, she still suffers from the adverse effects of the vaccine.  With over 20,000 adverse injuries reported and around 100 deaths, why is nothing being done to pull the vaccine from the market?   

I have personally seen the damage the vaccine can do to a young, healthy girl.  I feel it is justified to not allow the vaccine to be marketed for older women.  I personally would never consider this vaccine for my 18 year old son or for myself as one who falls in the older age bracket.  I wish I had known of the adverse effects and Gardasil prior to my daughter’s vaccine injury.     

I would like the FDA to explain how Gardasil is acceptable in younger women when they say it has not been demonstrated to prevent HPV-related CIN 2/3 or worse in women older than 26 years of age.  What is the difference?  How can it be accepted as safe in the younger group but not in the older group? 
Rosemary Mathis, North Carolina 

Our daughters will never recover the years they have lost suffering the side effects of a vaccine that has been on the market without enough evidence of its efficacy. The governments around the world should do something to prevent these things from ever happening again. 


Parents should be informed of the risks involved with this vaccine so they can make informed decisions about their daughter´s health. I wish I had known all the dangers this vaccine had before vaccinating my daughter - but the only information I received was (1) the vaccine protects women from getting cervical cancer - not true- and (2) the vaccine may only produce local effects such as pain or swelling on the site of the injection - not true either. 


When my daughter was in hospital we wrote a press release to the International Scientist Community asking for help and the answer we received was that the only two cases of seizures in Spain and Europe were the Valencian girls; one is my daughter. We felt hopeless when we learned all the incidents of seizures reported to VAERS before February 2009 when my daughter received her second shot. 

Now the FDA has rejected the use of Gardasil in women between 27-45 years old. In Spain, the vaccine is recommended for women older than 26. How can it be effective for women in one country – and not the other? How can this happen? 
Alicia Capilla, Spain 

Prior to my first injection of Gardasil, I had no health problems – that is not the case now. . A few weeks after my second injetion everything started to deteriorate. This led to paralysis and my cerebellum to shut down. 

My question is: Why me? I was 25 & 4 months when I received the first vaccine. Why is my genetic make up - or whatever it was that lead to this reaction - so different than if I was 8 months older? It does not make sense. If there is something in an individual’s genetic make up, should they not receive some sort of screening or testing prior to being vaccinated? 

We need to fill out pages of information to give blood (i.e. specimen coming out of our bodies), but this is not the same for something that goes into our body’s, and may stay there for a lifetime. Furthermore, it may change our lives forever. I struggle every single day to accomplish seemingly simple every day tasks, and there is no saying that this will change. And I am one of the lucky ones. 

We are guinea pigs. We place our lives in the hands of those who we believe are there to protect our health, and that sense of trust seems to be overwritten by money. Furthermore, not only was I a victim of Gardasil, the treatment to save my life - which is supplied by CSL Laboratories - was ultimately purchased by my parents to save my life as CSL would not donate it. 
Kristin Clulow, Australia 

What the heck is the difference in approving it for those who are one year younger! 


As a parent dealing with a 20 year old daughter badly damaged by Gardasil I can say whilst it is pleasing to see that the FDA has not approved Gardasil for women over 26, I guess the question that everyone  would now be asking is, what the heck is the difference in approving it for those one year younger! 

Stephen Tunley, Australia 

SANE Vax Inc., believes that if Gardasil has not been demonstrated to prevent CIN 2/3 or worse in older women the same applies for women younger than 26 years of age. Clinical trials used an endpoint insufficient to clearly demonstrate efficacy in this arena. Therefore, we believe that Gardasil needs to be taken off the market until an independent study on the vaccine’s safety and efficacy is conducted.   

•   The SaneVax Team and medical consumers around the world demand scientific proof that Gardasil® is safe, effective and necessary for the approved age groups. 

•   The SaneVax Team and medical consumers around the world, once again request the FDA rescind their approval of Gardasil® until studies are conducted with appropriate endpoints. 

The FDA has opened the door of doubt confirming our worst fears; Gardasil is a potentially dangerous vaccine fast-tracked into the medical consumer market without adequate testing. Medical consumers should never become medical experiments for the profit of the pharmaceutical industry or the government.  SANE Vax, Inc. will continue our global campaign on behalf of the parents whose daughters and sons have been injured or who have died post-vaccination, until the vaccine is taken off the market.


# # #

SaneVax believes only Safe, Affordable, Necessary & Effective vaccines and vaccination practices should be offered to the public. Our primary goal is to provide scientific information/resources for those concerned about vaccine safety, efficacy and need.

Wednesday, 6 April 2011

Vaccines and related biological products advisory committee meeting transcript (FDA)

November 17, 2010
Open public hearing
Roberta Boyce

This mother talks about Gardasil that made her daughter infertile.


MS. BOYCE:  I just want to start by saying I have no conflict of interest.  In fact I sold all my Merck stock when I found out what it had done to my daughter.

I am here today because my daughter was harmed by the Gardasil vaccine.  My daughter was actually sterilized by the vaccine.
I don’t have a medical degree but consider myself pretty well educated.  I’ve spent the past 2 years researching medical papers so I could understand why my daughter had such debilitating side effects post-Gardasil, and I read hundreds of medical papers from various sources.  There is a lot of misinformation out there about what causes HPV, in my opinion.
I presented information last September against the vaccine at a similar FDA meeting when you were considering extending the vaccine to boys and older women.  At that time I told the advisory panel that many of the Gardasil girls were showing symptoms of severe vitamin deficiencies, specifically niacin.  That in turn causes pyruvate kinase deficiency, something critical to the Krebs cycle.  For those of you in the audience here that don’t know, the Krebs cycle is a vital function in the body that provides nutrients for new red blood cells, energy, and glucose, and repairs cell damage during periods of stress.
If the person has severe pyruvate kinase deficiencies, the person exhibits a myriad of symptoms and can never recover unless they take supplements.  If they don’t get supplements, they continue to deteriorate.  That is what is happening with many of the Gardasil girls.  The symptoms are slightly different because of individual genetic makeup; however, all the side effects exhibited are caused by the same PK deficiency. 
Unfortunately, since PK deficiency is a relatively new finding, only discovered in 1996, the majority of doctors have never heard of it.  I am certain they don’t understand that the Gardasil vaccine would have catastrophic implications for these individuals.
Since PK deficiency or hemochromatosis is the most prevalent genetic trait in the United States, any individual having it would have a difficult time recovering from a vaccine.  But my daughter was never tested for this prior to vaccination, even though your charts show that you do not include people with those autoimmune disorders in your studies.
Does this mean that each person getting the Gardasil vaccine will actually get cancer from the vaccine if they have PK deficiency?  I don’t know, but certainly there are those with genetic deficiencies that will have issues with it.


Already the May 2006 FDA VRBPAC reports that if a woman has HPV and receives Gardasil, her chances of getting cervical cancer increase by 44.6 percent after inoculation.  Is it just possible that HPV is caused by PK deficiencies?  I believe so.  Shouldn’t patients be tested for the most prevalent genetic trait prior to vaccination if this vaccine would be so dangerous to them?  And what about the test studies?  Were individuals with PK studied, a predominantly Northern European trait included in the test studies?  Right now today you showed they were not.

In my opinion there were not parallel populations put in these studies, unless the study that was included from Costa Rica, they were expecting to market this vaccine to Hispanics, which I doubt, since it’s the most expensive vaccine ever produced.
The Merck Manual clearly cites several types of PK deficiencies and even suggests that individuals with these inherited disorders would not be candidates for vaccines.  A few types of PK deficiencies I would specifically point out are G6PD, a traditionally Jewish trait, sickle cell anemia, and thalassemia.  There are many other names for the same deficiency, such as Celtic Curse, HH, HFE, mel(?) or iron overload, but they are all the same PK deficiency.
In fact most if not all of us have a slight form of PK deficiency because of several issues, including toxins in our environment, in our homes, excess minerals in our drinking water and foods, alcohol consumption, and a gamut of other factors, including stress and exercise. 
I don’t believe scientists developing this vaccine had access to all the information they should have.  I want to believe that they did not understand that PK deficiency is also environmentally caused.  Everyone here needs to understand that PK deficiency is no longer just a genetic trait.  The effect of a live vaccine like Gardasil has tremendous implications for all of us because we all have some form of this deficiency.  We will not be able to recover from this vaccine and, perhaps slowly, will continue to exhibit debilitating side effects post-vaccine.
In April 2008 the FDA sent a warning letter to Merck citing two lot numbers, X and U, that had extra yeast.  I believe these lots exacerbated the problems of the vaccine, and the side effects that normally would have taken years to show up became obvious almost immediately.  Some side effects that normally might have been mild have now exploded.  Today there have been 84 deaths and over 20,000 severe side effects documented in our government VAERS system, and now Gardasil makes up more than 65 percent of the entire VAERS database.  The vast number of side effects that have been reported are from lots X and U that have the extra yeast.
India has already outlawed this vaccine because of what they have seen post-vaccination.
Many of you are aware that there is currently a lawsuit in the Supreme Court that will decide on certain vaccines having design flaws.  Gardasil, in my opinion, should be considered one of those vaccines.


First, the test trials never had a true placebo but instead used an aluminum adjuvant as the placebo.  Second, the vaccine was marketed as a vaccine to prevent cervical cancer, and yet the HPV virus has never proven to positively cause cervical cancer.  I would strongly argue that it is caused by genetic and environmentally caused PK deficiency.  Third, the long-term side effects of polysorbates, which can also cross the blood-brain barrier, were never thoroughly explored.

There are many medical papers documenting fertility issues in mice that have been administered polysorbates, and yet the long-term implications of these were never tested.  Merck has come right out and said they do not know if fertility will be an issue for these vaccinated children in the future.  This is a critical issue.  Could Merck have known that this vaccine would cause fertility issues in women wanting to conceive in the future?
Last year I stumbled upon a World Intellectual Property Organization paper which discussed pyruvate kinase deficiency in animals.  This was many of the “God moments” that I’ve had in the past 2 years since I found out my daughter was injured.  I know that’s not a popular stance to take in a government meeting, that I’ve had all these “God moments,” but let me tell you, it happens when you know your daughter is dying after a vaccine.
The paper I read talks about fertility impairment of cats and dogs.  The vaccine was administered in three doses over a 6-month period, and one of the main ingredients was polysorbates, also in Gardasil.  What was interesting about the paper was the animals with PK deficiencies did not sustain any sensation of menses post-vaccination -- very interesting and very scary, because it was exactly what I was seeing in my daughter post-Gardasil.
My daughter recently tested sterile at age 21, although she is still getting a relatively normal period.  Could it be that Merck intentionally developed this vaccine thinking it would affect a small number of individuals with PK deficiencies?  Is this what their intent was when they developed their recently approved fertility drug Aleva, which was just passed for European use?  I wonder if Merck and other big pharmas have intentionally taken advantage of genetic deficiencies.  I believe they have, and I believe this is what has happened many, many times over.  In fact today’s presentation by Dr. Garner clearly stated that DNA extractions were performed in their tests.


Imagine how a mother who wanted her daughter to have a vaccine would feel after learning all this information.  I was distraught knowing my daughter would likely be sterilized from the vaccine and it was my fault.  In my eyes, it seemed certain that my daughter had either a genetic or environmentally caused PK deficiency, since she had been exhibiting menopausal symptoms for several months and erratic periods, sometimes very heavy, usually coming every 2 weeks.  She complained of hair loss, experienced severe PMS symptoms and mood swings, and those were the more mild symptoms.

After recent tests my daughter had done, I can now positively confirm that my daughter tested post-menopausal as it relates to her hormone levels, with no family history of early menopause.  She is no longer ovulating and she has hormone levels of a 50-plus-year-old woman.  My worst nightmares have come true.
Because I am privy to information about the health of other girls through support groups that I am involved with -- two of them are truthaboutgardasil.org and sanevax.org -- I know there are many other girls who are also experiencing similar testing and their results are comparable to my daughter’s.
I am grateful to God for guiding me to the Gardasil groups I belong to.  There are many Christians among this group.  Both are very large and have hundreds of members like me, desperately trying to stop the HPV vaccine and find answers to help their daughters.  The sanevax.org group, which is a spinoff of truthaboutgardasil Web site, now has 69 countries spanning the globe using their resources.
God made us all slightly different, and we all have subtle genetic imperfections.  That is what makes us unique.  Unfortunately, I believe unethical people in big pharma have figured out how to take advantage of these imperfections.  That’s how they’ve made money in the past, and that’s how they intend to continue making money in the future, because they are beholden to their stockholders to bring in profits no matter what the cost, even if it means harming children to get their money.  


I must reiterate that I honestly doubt they took into account PK deficiencies were environmentally caused.  In my opinion, they didn’t know the damage done would be so astronomical.  But so far they have taken no action to help those harmed.  When families call Merck trying to get help, they will not even return phone calls.  Doctors don’t know how to correct the damage done and throw up their arms, saying the CDC and FDA say it’s safe.  These cases seem so complex, but clearly this vaccine is not safe.

I am pretty certain doctors aren’t even aware of the myriad of side effects they are saying are caused by PK deficiency.  Remember, it’s relatively new, only discovered in 1996.  It is horrifying to see previously perfectly healthy children now having seizures, migraines, pneumonias, personality disorders, fatigue, menstrual issues, vomiting, diarrhea, and the list goes on, post-Gardasil.  This vaccine needs to be pulled immediately.  Over 20,000 families are now begging for help, and no one is answering their desperate pleas.
I am begging you, do not expand this vaccine until there are answers to the problems that have already arisen.  How many children will have to die because this vaccine was a mistake of crazy proportion?  How many will be sterilized?
It’s my duty to leave you with one last thought, another God moment I had.  St. Augustine prophesied that Christians will make their own demise because they do not spread the word of God.  He called it the Celtic Curse.  Go look it up on the Internet.  It’s the same as hemochromatosis or PK deficiency.  Another coincidence?  I don’t think so.  Imagine if our entire world were vaccinated with Gardasil.  Will we all be sterilized?  The truth needs to be told.
Thank you.
DR. ROMERO:  Thank you, Ms. Boyce.
Are there any other public comments?
If not, then I would like to thank the speakers for their comments, and we will move on.


Full transcript here.

Sunday, 3 April 2011

New numbers reveal more Gardasil deaths

By WC Douglass, MD

Exposed!
Newly uncovered documents reveal that the world’s most tragic and dangerous public health experiment has claimed more young victims.
Gardasil, Merck’s horrifically bad HPV vaccine being pushed on little girls around the world, has been linked to 16 more deaths — including four suicides — and thousands of other terrifying side effects.
Even more outrageous, the feds have been busy trying to cover it up — because instead of immediately warning the public and ending the program, they tried to hide all the damning evidence.
The FDA only came clean when forced to by the law after Judicial Watch filed a demand for the data under the Freedom of Information Act.
And in addition to the dozens of deaths already linked to this vaccine, FDA documents obtained by Judicial Watch revealed 16 new deaths between May 2009 and last month.
That’s one young life needlessly cut short every month.
The FDA papers also revealed 3,589 new cases of adverse events after Gardasil vaccinations, including 789 “serious” cases, 213 that led to permanent disability, and 25 diagnoses of the debilitating and paralyzing nervous system disorder Guillain-Barre Syndrome.
And for what? For nothing!
Despite its poorly chosen nickname, all this “cervical cancer vaccine” really offers is very limited protection from some of the strains of HPV that can cause the disease — and researchers say even that can wear off in just a few years.
It’s a clear case of “all risk and no benefit,” but that hasn’t stopped Big Pharma from pushing to have Gardasil added to the list of required vaccinations for school.
Virginia has even made it a law. But if you happen to live in that state, don’t be intimidated by these bully tactics: You can spare your own daughter by simply refusing to let them stick her with this poison.
Just stick to your guns. One parent named in the new report said she initially declined the vaccination for her daughter, but was talked into it by the doctor.
Five weeks later, her 13-year-old girl was dead.
One more note: I’m old enough to remember when Pravda, the old Soviet news agency, was the Kremlin’s comically relentless propaganda wing. Today, the Pravda Web site has better reporting on Gardasil than you’ll find in most Western newspapers, with one recent article pointing out all the vaccine’s ugly flaws and accusing Merck of ignoring its own research.
I still don’t truskie the Russkies on most issues, but it just goes to show how our own pro-Big Pharma media has become a propaganda machine of its own.

Wednesday, 29 December 2010

About the HPV vaccines

Barbara Loe Fisher from the National Vaccine Information Center warns about the HPV shots.



The HPV Vaccine: Science, Ethics and Regulation.
Examining the HPV vaccine deaths in India.
http://epw.in/epw/uploads/articles/15440.pdf