Friday, 18 November 2011

Smoke, Mirrors, and the “Disappearance” Of Polio

By Suzanne Humphries, MD

The tendency of a mass vaccination program is to herd people. People are not cattle or sheep. They should not be herded. A mass vaccination program carries a built-in temptation to oversimplify the problem; to exaggerate the benefits; to minimize or completely ignore the hazards; to discourage or silence scholarly, thoughtful and cautious opposition; to create an urgency where none exists; to whip up an enthusiasm among citizens that can carry with it the seeds of impatience, if not intolerance; to extend the concept of the police power of the state in quarantine far beyond its proper limitation; to assume simplicity when there is actually great complexity; to continue to support a vaccine long after it has been discredited;… to ridicule honest and informed consent.[1]

There is plenty of confusion on the topic of vaccination, especially amongst brainwashed doctors who trusted their medical schools. Then the unsuspecting, trusting public trusts them…because the medical establishment must know best, right? And doctors are nice people, trying to do a good thing. True. I was once one of those brainwashed doctors who believed in the benevolence of the medical system and believed that all I learned was the best that modern times had to offer. It is blazingly clear to me now though, that much of what is taught in medical school is enormously limited. I now see that most doctors are little more than blind slave-technicians who follow the dogma they were taught and were rewarded for repeating, even as the truth unfolds in front of them dictating otherwise.

Unbeknownst to most doctors, the polio-vaccine history involves a massive public health service makeover during an era when a live, deadly strain of poliovirus infected the Salk polio vaccines, and paralyzed hundreds of children and their contacts. These were the vaccines that were supposedly responsible for the decline in polio from 1955 to 1961! But there is a more sinister reason for the “decline” in polio during those years; in 1955, a very creative re-definition of poliovirus infections was invented, to “cover” the fact that many cases of ”polio” paralysis had no poliovirus in their systems at all. While this protected the reputation of the Salk vaccine, it muddied the waters of history in a big way.

Even during the peak epidemics, unifactorial poliovirus infection, resulting in long-term paralysis, was a low-incidence disease[2] that was falsely represented as a rampant and violent crippler by Basil O’Connor’s “March Of Dimes” advertising campaigns. At the same time as Basil O’Connor was pulling in 45 million dollars a year to fund the Salk vaccine development, scientists started to realize that other viruses like Coxsackie, echo and enteroviruses, could also cause polio. They also discussed the fact that lead, arsenic, DDT, and other commonly-used neurotoxins, could identically mimic the lesions of polio. During the great epidemics in the United States, the pathology called polio was reversed by alternative medical doctors who attested to great success, using detoxification procedures available at the time – yet they were categorically ignored[3].

Now it is admitted in the medical literature that other viruses can cause polio, yet few people on the street have any idea.

Prior to 1954, the following undoubtedly hid behind the name “poliomyelitis”: Transverse Myelitis, viral or “aseptic” meningitis, Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS)- (what Franklin Delano Roosevelt had)[4], Chinese Paralytic syndrome, Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, epidemic cholera, cholera morbus, spinal meningitis, spinal apoplexy, inhibitory palsy, intermittent fever, famine fever, worm fever, bilious remittent fever, ergotism, post-polio syndrome, acute flaccid paralysis(AFP).

Included under the umbrella term “Acute Flaccid Paralysis” are Poliomyelitis, Transverse Myelitis, Guillain-BarrĂ© syndrome, enteroviral encephalopathy, traumatic neuritis, Reye’s syndrome etc.

Before you believe that polio has been eradicated, have a look at this graph of AFP and Polio.


When people ask me where all the children on iron lungs are, I would answer that they should ask Dr. Douglas Kerr from Johns Hopkins, who stated on pg. xv in the Forward to Donna Jackson Nakazawa’s book “The Autoimmune Epidemic”…

Infants as young as five months old can get Transverse Myelitis, and some are left permanently paralyzed and dependent upon a ventilator to breathe… my colleagues at the Johns Hopkins Hospital and I hear about or treat hundreds of new cases every year.”

Does the public have any idea that there are hundreds of cases of something that would once have been called polio, and some of those children will be dependent on a modern version of the iron lung? No. Parents today think that the Salk vaccine eliminated any need for ventilators, because the pictures of all these children on iron lungs are no longer paraded in front of people in order to create fear. Besides which, today’s “iron lungs” don’t look like a prototype submarine. They are barely recognizable as today’s “ventilators.”

The polio vaccine had the fastest licensing in FDA history. It was approved for commercial production after only a two-hour deliberation amongst the Licensing Committee, in a pressured environment. These scientists witnessed a vaccine that was escorted to market, before academic and community doctors had a chance to read any published reports on the safety studies, and before the results of the big polio vaccine trial made it into any medical journal. If these scientists had had more say, it is likely that the “Cutter” disaster and the “Wyeth problem,” both events that led to crippling or death of vaccine recipients just weeks following the hurried vaccine licensing – could have been averted.

“Previously it [the vaccine] had been distributed as an experimental product, not a licensed product…the committee was asked to come to a decision very quickly…there was discussion of the report that Dr Francis had given, but we were not in a position to discuss it very intensively because we had not seen the report prior to this morning and the report was distributed to us after the presentation…we were pressured in the sense that we were told that speed was essential, and when we came up toward the 5:00 time, some of us felt we would like to discuss this matter more. We were told that to discuss the matter further it would have to go into the following week, and we would have to go to Washington or Bethesda and most of the members were unwilling to do so. We were in effect pressured into an earlier decision than we ordinarily would have made. …It was part of the pressure of events, put it that way.[5]

And that is only the beginning of the polio story, the likes of which currently serve as the foundation of modern belief in vaccination, even by those who may have doubts regarding current vaccine policy.

No vaccines are safe. Having “efficacy” means an antibody response is generated, not that they keep you from getting sick. There are many other ways to keep children healthy other than injecting them with disease matter, chemicals, animal DNA, animal proteins, detergents and surfactants that inflame and weaken the blood brain barrier, potentially causing inflammation and other problems.

Do you know how much doctors learn about vaccines in medical school? When we participate in pediatrics training, we learn that vaccines need to be given on schedule. We learn that smallpox and polio were eliminated by vaccines. We learn that there’s no need to know how to treat diphtheria, because we won’t see it again anyway. We are indoctrinated with the mantra that “vaccines are safe and effective” – neither of which is true.

Doctors today are given extensive training on how to talk to “hesitant” parents – how to frighten them by vastly inflating the risks during natural infection. They are trained on the necessity of twisting parents’ arms to conform, or fire them from their practices. Doctors are trained that NOTHING bad should be said about any vaccine, period.

Historically it has been commonplace, since the times of the deadly smallpox vaccines – to discourage or silence scholarly, thoughtful and cautious opposition to mass vaccination policies. This is politics, plain and simple, in the environment of cronyism and corporatism that has invaded the supposed health-care industry.

The opinions of learned anti-vaccinationist doctors are not permitted on CNN, Fox News, or in mainstream literature. Probably because if they were broadcast on such media outlets, the unsuspecting public would do an about-face. Instead, the publicity that mainstream media concedes, often involves a parent who is opposed to vaccination, after a child becomes vaccine-injured, matched up with a celebrity talking-head doctor. Dr. Stork had an all-out tantrum after JB Handley got some sense interjected (from the audience!) during Jenny McCarthy’s invite (video).

For now, let’s just ignore Dr. Sears’ utter delusion over the history of vaccination and the decline in infectious disease. Having JB Handley on the program with the audience clapping for him, without editing him, was an unusual event. The standard approach on commercial television is to pretend that there is no anti-vaccinationist doctor to match the celebrity doctor, or those of the Paul Offit genre. Therefore, they can only invite and publicly defeat those whom they underestimate. Cheers to JB for getting an edge in. This is simply how the game of vaccination has always been played; keep the opinions of thoughtful and informed doctors and scientists out of the way of the cameras and peer-reviewed journals, and only allow the anti-vaccine perspective limited representation.

If you have doubts on the safety and effectiveness of vaccination, please keep your curiosity up, since the lives of your children may depend on it. You will probably have much deprogramming to do, just like most of us had.

International Medical Council on Vaccination | www.vaccinationcouncil.org

[1] Statement from Clinton R. Miller, Intensive Immunization Programs, May 15th and 16th, 1962. Hearings before the Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce House of Representatives, 87th congress, second session on H.R. 10541.

[2] Meier, P. 1978. “The biggest public health experiment ever: The 1954 trial of the Salk poliomyelitis
vaccine.” Statistics: A Guide to the Unknown, Ed. J. M. Tanur, el al., pp. 3-15. San Francisco: Holden Day.

[3] Scobey, R. 1952. “The poison cause of poliomyelitis and obstructions to its investigation.” Arch. Pediatr. April;69(4):172-93.

[4] Goldman.2003.”What was the cause of Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s paralytic illness?” J Med Biog, 11:233-240.

[5] Opening brief of Defendant and Appellant Cutter Laboratories Gottsdanker v. Cutter Laboratories (1960) 182 Cal. App.2d 602 pp. 31-33.

Thursday, 17 November 2011

Europe's central bankers spurn Cameron's debt advice

By Faisal Islam
Economics Editor
Channel 4 News

When David Cameron travels to Berlin to meet Chancellor Merkel, top of the agenda will be coaxing the European Central Bank in Frankfurt to act as last resort lender to the Eurozone’s troubled nations.

Today those nations include Spain, which was forced to borrow money in the markets at a fraction under 7%. That is, it actually paid 7% today, despite the likely arrival in government on Sunday of a conservative government with a thumping majority. Tough times which reflect concern that Frankfurt is falling short.

The Prime minister, a self-described “monetary activist” will no doubt be advising Frau Merkel of just how sensible it is to have a central bank that buys government debt by the bucket load. The policy would lower the unsustainable government borrowing rates of Italy and Spain at a stroke. For Washington and London it is the silver bullet, the bazooka, the easy answer to killing off this euro crisis.

But he will not just be fighting the tide of 20th Century German history which sees printing money as a dangerous precursor to hyperinflation, social collapse and political disaster.

In Germany they still cling to the idea that the ECB is totally independent of government interference, let alone that from a euro-outsider like the UK. There is an increasingly vocal backlash at the top of the European monetary system at unwanted monetary policy advice, particularly from Britain.

I was present at a recent talk by the Governor of the Banque de France, Christian Noyer, who sits on the Governing council of the European Central Bank. “We are paying the price for our virtue and our refusal to liquefy our debt through massive monetisation of our fiscal deficits,” said Governor Noyer in a clear reference to Britain, and to a lesser extent the US.

Elsewhere in his talk Noyer singled out the Bank of England’s £275 billion purchase of UK government bonds which have contributed to the UK’s record low funding costs. He compared Britain’s record unfavourably with that of the ECB. “Those purchases amount to 51% of the total debt issued since 2009 in the UK, 21% in the US and 7.6% in the euro area,” he said. A version of the same speech was given in Tokyo last month, and can be read in English here.

The Bank of England denies that it has engaged in a “massive monetisation” of Britain’s debt pile, specifically because it has promised to resell this debt back into the market at some point in the future. Many in the markets share Governor Noyer’s doubts that this will actually ever happen.

When I recently mentioned to Mr Noyer that it was great to interview a central bank Governor, because in the UK we only seem to get an interview when they are printing money, he burst out laughing with a rather knowing look. My joke was not that funny.

Other senior European Monetary officials speaking privately, struggle to hide their irritation at Britain.

They point to the fact that the balance sheets of both the Bank of England and the Federal Reserve have more than doubled during the crisis. They point to the fact that ECB’s purchase of sovereign debt amount to 1.6% of eurozone GDP. For Britain it is 16%. An amazing statistic.

Markus Kerber, the German economist who has led the constitutional charge against the ECB’s existing Italian and Spanish bond purchases, puts it clearly.

“German sovereignty is not compatible with any piece of advice by the US president or the British PM, who have already printed a lot of money. They should know that Germany will resist this piece of advice, [because] mega-inflation is the nightmare consequence, the unavoidable consequence of printing money,” he said.

British inflation is by far the highest of the major European economies, and the Bank of England acknowledges that its quantitative easing policy has contributed.

I put some of these points to Sir Mervyn King yesterday. He backed up both the ECB and the Bundesbank. He rightly suggested that trying to transfer German taxpayers money to the PIIGS through the backdoor of the ECB was just a means of avoiding a political question. “The euro area has the resources to deal [with the crisis] itself… it is why the ECB thinks it is not the job of a Central Bank to do the job of government”.

So perhaps, after Mr Cameron namechecked the ECB repeatedly last week, Number 10 will be reined in by Threadneedle Street.

For now, Europe has begun to notice Britain’s monetary record. But as an example to avoid, rather than to follow.

What actually happened with MF Global

By Gerald Celente
Trends Research Institute

Wednesday, 16 November 2011

Flu vaccine statistics don’t add up

A study recently published in The Lancet (thelancet.com/journals) reveals that flu shots only prevent influenza in 1.5 out of every 100 adults. Tao those who are familiar with vaccine literature, this comes as no surprise. What is interesting, however, is that the Centres for Disease Control and the corporate media are interpreting the study as proof that flu vaccines are 60 per cent effective. So let’s examine the study to see how this spin transpired.

This was a meta analysis, meaning that the researchers used data from 28 previously published random controlled trials between 1967 and 2011. The control group, n=13,095, consisted of non-vaccinated adults who were monitored to see if they got confirmed influenza. Over 97 per cent of them did not. Only 357 got flu which means that 2.73 per cent of these adults got the flu in the first place.

The treatment group comprised adults who were vaccinated with a trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine. According to the study, 1.18 per cent got the flu.

The difference between these two groups (2.73 – 1.18) is 1.5 people out of 100. In other words, the flu vaccine did nothing for 98.5 per cent of adults in the studies.

So where did the media get 60 per cent effective? It’s called lying with statistics. First you take the 2.73 per cent in the control group who got flu and you divide that figure into the 1.18 per cent of the treatment group who got the flu. This gives you 0.43.

You then say that 0.43 is 43 per cent of 2.73 and claim that the vaccine results in a 57 per cent decrease in flu infections. This becomes the 60 per cent effectiveness claim.

Now even if you don’t understand statistics, common sense will tell you comparing 2.73 per cent non-vaccinated who got the flu with 1.8 per cent vaccinated who got the flu, shows very little difference.

Medical practitioners tout that they practice “evidence-based” medicine or nursing. So all those who are so willing to inject mercury containing vaccines into people under the delusion that they are forwarding public health, and those nursing instructors at Selkirk College who mandate that nursing students get a flu shot, should be required to submit the scientific evidence for their decisions.

J.L. Craig, BSN, Ph.D

Nelson

The dark side of depression meds

By William Campbell Douglass II, M.D. 

Boys, girls, men and women -- they all have one thing in common: If they're taking any drug at all, it's almost bound to be a daily dose of happy pills. 

New numbers from the CDC show the market for antidepressants has exploded beyond even the wildest drug industry fantasies -- up 400 percent since 1988, with the biggest growth among those who might end up using them the longest. 

Teens. 

Nothing like getting someone started on a lifelong habit early, right? 

After all, that's what this is really about -- and teens, always bummed about something anyway, represent the perfect marketing opportunity: Their use of these meds quadrupled over 20 years. 

But you'd have to be clinically insane to let your own kids take these meds, because the same antidepressants that can't even beat placebos in many studies can actually INCREASE the risk of suicide in that very age group. 

On the other hand, parents are too busy popping their own pills to notice -- and, sorry ladies, but that's especially true of mom: A quarter of all women between 40 and 59 are now on antidepressants, and I'd bet my white jacket that many of them are operating under the delusion that these drugs can help with menopause. 

They can't -- as I told you over the summer, that's just a myth being pushed to sell still more meds to still more people who don't need them. (Read that story here.)

Truth is, most cases of depression in any age or gender come from one of two main causes: sad events and poor nutrition. 

No pill in the world will bring back a dead relative, un-fire you from your job, help you find a mate, or cure teen angst... so you're just going to have to deal with those issues the way we have for centuries: on your own. 

But if you're suffering from a more general case of the blahs, odds are you're just missing out on the key B vitamins needed to regulate mood. 

If that's your story, don't visit your doctor -- and don't even think about calling a shrink. Drop by the butcher instead and order up a supply of the fattiest steaks he has on hand -- the tastiest natural source of B vitamins -- and grill your blues away.